Wyniki wyszukiwania

Autor	Mykola Orlykovskyi, Ludwik Wicki
Tytuł	Znaczenie sektora agrobiznesu w Polsce i na Ukrainie
Title	Agribusiness Sector in Poland and Ukraine
Słowa kluczowe	agrobiznes, handel zagraniczny, wydajność pracy, struktura agrobiznesu, Ukraina
Key words	agribusiness, foreign trade, labor productivity, agribusiness structure, Ukraine
Abstrakt	W artykule podjęto próbę oceny porównawczej znaczenia agrobiznesu w gospodarce na Ukrainie i w Polsce. Analizą objęto lata 2001-2015. Dane pochodziły z oficjalnych źródeł statystycznych. Stwierdzono, że znaczenie agrobiznesu w Polsce w całym okresie zmniejszało się, a jego udział w wartości dodanej brutto w gospodarce wynosił w 2015 roku 6%, podczas, gdy na Ukrainie było to aż 15% i w ostatnich latach wzrastało. Agrobiznes miał też wysoki udział w eksporcie. W Polsce było to 15%, a na Ukrainie aż 38% w 2015 roku. W strukturze zatrudnienia w agrobiznesie dominowało rolnictwo z udziałem około 80% w obu krajach. Wewnętrzna struktura agrobiznesu była nowocześniejsza w Polsce, gdzie aż 58% wartości dodanej brutto było generowane w sektorze przetwórstwa żywności. Na Ukrainie było to tylko 24%. Znaczenie agrobiznesu w gospodarce ukraińskiej było wyższe niż w polskiej, ma on też tam bardziej surowcowy charakter. Na Ukrainie większy jest potencjał dalszego rozwoju wynikający z dużych zasobów ziemi rolniczej i możliwości wzrostu przetwórstwa żywności i jej eksportu.
Abstract	The article attempts to compare the importance of agribusiness in the economy in Ukraine and Poland. The analysis covered the years 2001-2015. The data came from official statistical sources. It was found that the importance of agribusiness to the Polish economy decreased over the entire period considered, its share in GVA in whole economy in 2015 was 6%, while in Ukraine it was as much as 15% and in recent years has been increasing. Agrobusiness also had a high share in exports. In Poland, it was 15, and in Ukraine as much as 38% in 2015. The employment structure in agribusiness was dominated by employment in agriculture with a share of about 80% in both countries. The internal structure of agribusiness was more modern in Poland, where as much as 58% of gross value added of agribusiness was generated in the food processing sector. In Ukraine, it was only 24%. The importance of agribusiness in the Ukrainian economy was higher than in Poland, it also has there a more raw character. The bigger potential for further development of agribusiness is in Ukraine, due to the large agricultural land resources and the large potential for increased production and processing of food and its exports.
Cytowanie	Orlykovskyi M., Wicki L. (2019) Znaczenie sektora agrobiznesu w Polsce i na Ukrainie.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 19(34), z. 2: 210-223
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2019_T19(34)_n2_s210.pdf

Autor	Victor Artish, Ruslan Buriak, Mykola Orlykovskyi
Tytuł	Management and Certification Process for Organic Production in Ukraine and Poland
Title	Management and Certification Process for Organic Production in Ukraine and Poland
Słowa kluczowe	organic production, agricultural production, quality, agriculture, control, certification, financial support
Key words	organic production, agricultural production, quality, agriculture, control, certification, financial support
Abstrakt	A systematic analysis of trends in the development of organic products in Ukraine and Poland was carried out, which showed that the total area of certified ecological lands for the study period from 2006-2016 in Ukraine increased by 1.7 times, and in Poland from 2004-2014 it increased by 12 times. It has been established that the most significant impact on qualitative structural changes in the economic sector is adjustment to European standards that establish a favorable system of agricultural production regulation, marking and inspection of organic products. This is why Poland, while being in the European Union, has a significant advantage over Ukraine. The system of control and certification by the authorized bodies is generalized, as well as the mechanism of financial support for organic agricultural production. The necessity of using the experience of Poland with the purpose of greening agriculture and development of organic agricultural production in Ukraine is emphasized.
Abstract	A systematic analysis of trends in the development of organic products in Ukraine and Poland was carried out, which showed that the total area of certified ecological lands for the study period from 2006-2016 in Ukraine increased by 1.7 times, and in Poland from 2004-2014 it increased by 12 times. It has been established that the most significant impact on qualitative structural changes in the economic sector is adjustment to European standards that establish a favorable system of agricultural production regulation, marking and inspection of organic products. This is why Poland, while being in the European Union, has a significant advantage over Ukraine. The system of control and certification by the authorized bodies is generalized, as well as the mechanism of financial support for organic agricultural production. The necessity of using the experience of Poland with the purpose of greening agriculture and development of organic agricultural production in Ukraine is emphasized.
Cytowanie	Artish V., Buriak R., Orlykovskyi M. (2018) Management and Certification Process for Organic Production in Ukraine and Poland.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 18(33), z. 3: 59-66
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2018_T18(33)_n3_s59.pdf

Autor	Mykola Orlykovskyi, Ludwik Wicki, Lesia Zaburanna
Tytuł	Agriculture in Poland and Ukraine – Potential and Dynamics of Changes in Production
Title
Słowa kluczowe	productivity gap, agriculture efficiency, production factors, agriculture development
Key words
Abstrakt	The article attempts to compare the importance of agriculture and the dynamics of its development in Ukraine and Poland. The most important constraints on the development of Ukrainian agriculture were identified, including the unregulated land market, lack of coherent support programs for agriculture and rural areas, poorly developed infrastructure of the agricultural environment and lack of capital for development. It was found that agriculture in Ukraine is characterized by a high growth rate of productivity and production. The observed output gap in relation to agriculture in Poland is about 10 years. The agricultural sector in Ukraine has about 10% share in generating GDP and as much as 40% share in exports. Such high importance can be maintained even in the conditions of economic development, as there are large reserves in the development of agribusiness. The most important development factors include the introduction of a coherent program for the development of the agribusiness sector, including production of goods with high added value and increasing the availability of capital for the development of agriculture. A great opportunity is the development of trade in the conditions of affiliation with the EU.
Abstract
Cytowanie	Orlykovskyi M., Wicki L., Zaburanna L. (2017) Agriculture in Poland and Ukraine – Potential and Dynamics of Changes in Production.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 17(32), z. 4: 326-338
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2017_T17(32)_n4_s326.pdf

Autor	Mykola Orlykovskyi, Ludwik Wicki
Tytuł	Polityka i programy wsparcia rolnictwa w warunkach stowarzyszenia i członkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej. Wnioski dla Ukrainy
Title	The Policy and Programmes of Support for Agriculture in the Conditions of the Association and the Polish Membership in the European Union. Lessons for Ukraine
Słowa kluczowe	wspólna polityka rolna, WPR, wsparcie rolnictwa, modernizacja rolnictwa, Ukraina
Key words	common agricultural policy, CAP, support for agriculture, modernisation of agriculture, Ukraine
Abstrakt
Abstract
Cytowanie	Orlykovskyi M., Wicki L. (2016) Polityka i programy wsparcia rolnictwa w warunkach stowarzyszenia i członkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej. Wnioski dla Ukrainy .
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	MONO_2016_lwicki_polityka_i_programy_wsparcia.pdf

Autor	Yulia Galchynska, Mariusz Maciejczak, Mykola Orlykovskyi, Ludwik Wicki
Tytuł	Rozwój biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy na Ukrainie – w kierunku systemu dyfuzji innowacji opartego o model poczwórnej helisy
Title	Development of Ukrainian’s knowledge based bioeconomy – towards a system of innovations’ diffusion based on quadruple helix model
Słowa kluczowe	biogospodarka oparta na wiedzy, dyfuzja innowacji, model poczwórnej helisy, Ukraina
Key words	knowledge based bioeconomy, innovation diffusion, quadruple helix model, Ukraine
Abstrakt	W artykule podjęto próbę oceny stanu rozwoju sektora biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy na Ukrainie. Jednocześnie dokonano oceny na ile obecny rozwój wpisuje się w koncepcję systemu dyfuzji innowacji opartą na modelu poczwórnej helisy, oraz wskazano na najważniejsze czynniki sprzyjające i ograniczające ów rozwój. Stwierdzono, iż Ukraina posiada znaczący potencjał czynników wytwórczych dla produkcji biomasy, który dotychczas wykorzystywany jest na potrzeby biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy w znikomym stopniu, czego główną przyczyną jest niski stopień dyfuzji innowacji, głównie w zakresie biotechnologii. Obecny rozwój w niskim stopniu oparty jest na koncepcji poczwórnej helisy, co jednocześnie stanowi o dużym potencjale wzrostu na najbliższe lata. Właściwie ukierunkowana polityka gospodarcza może w znacznym stopniu wpłynąć na rozwój biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy na Ukrainie.
Abstract	The paper is an attempts to assess the state of development of the knowledge based bioeconomy in Ukraine. It also aims to evaluate how the current development complies in line with the concept of innovation diffusion model based on quadruple helix, and through, identify the most important factors strengthening and limiting this development. It was found that Ukraine has significant potential of production factors, in particular biomass, which so far is in limited scale used for the needs of a knowledge-based bioeconomy that is in infancy. The main reason is the low level of diffusion of innovation, mainly in the field of biotechnology. The current development in a low degree is based on the concept of quadruple helix, which on other hands also represents a high potential of growth for the coming years. Adequately oriented economic policies would greatly affect the development of a knowledge-based bioeconomy in Ukraine.
Cytowanie	Galchynska Y., Maciejczak M., Orlykovskyi M., Wicki L. (2016) Rozwój biogospodarki opartej na wiedzy na Ukrainie – w kierunku systemu dyfuzji innowacji opartego o model poczwórnej helisy.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 16(31), z. 1: 164-176
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2016_T16(31)_n1_s164.pdf

Autor	Mykola Orlykovskyi, Natalia Poprozman, Mirosław Wasilewski, Lesia Zaburanna
Tytuł	Methodological Aspects of Creating the System of Indicators of Crisis Prevention as the Foundation for Stabilization of Agricultural Production Based on Ukrainian Experience
Title
Słowa kluczowe
Key words	indicators of crisis, agricultural production, stabilization, crisis prevention, economic development, agrarian economy
Abstrakt
Abstract	The article deals with the methodological principles of determining the indicators of the economic development of agricultural production, which are based on the requirements of the EU Common Agricultural Policy and which will identify the possibility of crises both in agriculture and its sub-sectors, as well as the national economy as a whole. The system which is reacting to the crisis indicators and allows assessment of the stability of economic development of agricultural production was proposed. Analytical approaches to diagnosis prehistory development and identify indicators – reacting to the crisis indicators by analyzing and evaluating indexes of dynamics in periods of stability (relatively stable path of development) and the crisis (sharp kink economic dynamics) and graphically analytical method of determination. For sectors show synthetic indicators (agricultural production, the level of monetization of the economy, import-export ratio) that serve as functional criteria for identify in previous periods of force majeure or crisis as precursor’s crisis.
Cytowanie	Orlykovskyi M., Poprozman N., Wasilewski M., Zaburanna L. (2016) Methodological Aspects of Creating the System of Indicators of Crisis Prevention as the Foundation for Stabilization of Agricultural Production Based on Ukrainian Experience.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 16(31), z. 4: 308-321
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2016_T16(31)_n4_s308.pdf